|
課程名稱 |
比較東南亞政治專題
Seminar on Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia |
|
開課學期 |
109-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 政治學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
黃凱苹 |
|
課號 |
PS7616 |
|
課程識別碼 |
322 M5340 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
2.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期三6,7(13:20~15:10) |
|
上課地點 |
社科研603 |
|
備註 |
比較政治。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：17人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1091PS7616_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
本課程的目的在以東南亞國家為核心，討論有關政治發展的理論與概念，了解各國在政治發展上顯現不同成果的原因，亦探討幾個塑造發展中國家社會、經濟和政治發展的關鍵主題。本課程將分成幾個主題討論，每周並針對特定國家深入理解。同學在課餘時應補充東南亞各國的歷史與體制等相關資訊，以作為理解指定文本與課堂深入討論之用。 |
|
課程目標 |
本課程的目標在於讓碩士生理解比較政治裡的幾個關鍵概念與理論，了解這些概念與理論如何被應用在實際的案例分析，並以此理解跨國分析的準則與方法。學習過程中，除了對東南亞國家的政治與體制能有深入認識外，也能以其為案例進行理論的比較研究。本課程依主題主要選擇下列東南亞國家討論：菲律賓、越南、泰國、新加坡、馬來西亞、印尼、柬埔寨與緬甸。 |
|
課程要求 |
成績評量方式與標準
（請說明各項評量項目內容設計、比例及標準）Grading 依時程繳交期中與期末報告，並以課堂參與評分。評分比重如下：
期末報告 80%
課堂參與 20%
期中與期末報告由同學選定一個題目做申論文，題目可事先與授課老師討論。評分標準包括是否有清楚的立論，是否有足夠與令人信服的原因與例證支持立論，以及立論與文獻的相關性等。
評分分為五個等第進行評分
95 90 85 80 75
本課程對學生課後學習之要求
Requirements for students after the class:學生應於課餘時間了解東南亞各國之政經情勢 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週四 12:00~13:00 |
|
指定閱讀 |
列於每周課程安排 |
|
參考書目 |
列於每周課程安排 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
期末報告 |
80% |
|
2. |
課堂參與 |
20% |
|
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/16 |
課程介紹 /認識東南亞
閱讀進度: Ba, Alice D. and Mark Beeson. Eds. 2018. Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation. 3rd Edition. London: Palgrave. Pp. 1-11; Croissant, Aurel and Philip Lorenz. 2018. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Springer. Pp. 1-14.
參考閱讀: Emmerson, Donald. 1984. “Southeast Asia: What’s in a Name?” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 14 (1): 1–21.
|
|
第2週 |
9/23 |
歷史制度論、殖民主義及其遺緒: 印尼
閱讀進度: Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369-404. Tarling, Nicholas. 2004. “Construction”, In Nationalism in Southeast Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 59-87; Nawawi, Mohd. A. 1971. “Punitive Colonialism: The Dutch and the Indonesian National Integration”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 2(2): 159-168.
參考閱讀: Ba, Alice D. and Mark Beeson. Eds. 2018. Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation. 3rd Edition. London: Palgrave. Pp. 27-32. Croissant, Aurel and Philip Lorenz. 2018. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Springer. Pp. 71-112.
|
|
第3週 |
9/30 |
殖民主義及其遺緒: 馬來西亞、新加坡、緬甸
閱讀進度: Stockwell, T., 2005. “Forging Malaysia and Singapore: Colonialism, decolonization and nation-building”, Nation-building: five Southeast Asian histories. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Pp.191-219; Hirschman, C.. 1986. “The making of race in colonial Malaya: Political economy and racial ideology”, In Sociological Forum (Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 330-361). Kluwer Academic Publishers; Aung-Thwin, M., 1985. The British “pacification” of Burma: Order without meaning. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16(2): pp.245-261.
參考閱讀: Croissant, Aurel and Philip Lorenz. 2018. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Springer. Pp. 141-168; 177-207; 255-284..
|
|
第4週 |
10/07 |
殖民主義及其遺緒: 越南、柬埔寨、菲律賓、泰國
閱讀進度: Goscha, C.E., 2009. Widening the colonial encounter: Asian connections inside French Indochina during the interwar period. Modern Asian Studies, 43(5), pp.1189-1228; Zialcita, F.N., 1995. State formation, colonialism and national identity in Vietnam and the Philippines. Philippine quarterly of culture and society, 23(2), pp.77-117; London, B., 1979. Internal colonialism in Thailand: primate city parasitism reconsidered. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14(4), pp.485-513.
參考閱讀: Croissant, Aurel and Philip Lorenz. 2018. Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia. An Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Springer. Pp. 35-64; 213-248; 291-324; 367-398.
|
|
第5週 |
10/14 |
獨立運動與民族主義:印尼與菲律賓
閱讀進度: Tarling, Nicholas. 2004. “Nationalist Movement”, In Nationalism in Southeast Asia, London: Routledge, pp. 86-117; Barker, J., 2008. Beyond Bandung: developmental nationalism and (multi) cultural nationalism in Indonesia. Third World Quarterly, 29(3), pp.521-540; Teehankee, J.C., 2016. Duterte's resurgent nationalism in the Philippines: a discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 35(3), pp.69-89.
參考閱讀: Sutherland, Claire. 2018. “Nationalism and Ethnicity on Southeast Asia”, In Alice D. Ba and Mark Beeson, eds., Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation. 3rd Edition. London: Palgrave. Pp. 34-48.
|
|
第6週 |
10/21 |
獨立運動與民族主義: 泰國與越南
閱讀進度: Winichakul, T., 2008. Nationalism and the radical intelligentsia in Thailand. Third World Quarterly, 29(3), pp.575-591; Ball, W.M., 1952. Nationalism and Communism in Vietnam. Far Eastern Survey, 21(3), pp.21-27; Tran, N.A., 2012. Contested Nationalism: Ethnic Identity and State Power in the Republic of Vietnam, 1954-1963. Pp. 11-16
|
|
第7週 |
10/28 |
族群衝突: 馬來西亞
閱讀進度: Brown, David. 1996. “Ethnicity and the State,” in The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 1-32; Hamayotsu, K., 2002. “Islam and Nation Building in Southeast Asia: Malaysia and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective.” Pacific Affairs 75(3): 353-375; Jesudason, J.V., 1997. Chinese business and ethnic equilibrium in Malaysia. Development and change, 28(1), pp.119-141.
延伸閱讀: Jung, Eunsook. 2018. “Islam and Politics in Contemporary Southeast Asia”, In Alice D. Ba and Mark Beeson, eds., Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation. 3rd Edition. London: Palgrave. Pp. 131-145
|
|
第8週 |
11/04 |
族群衝突: 緬甸
閱讀進度: Walton, M.J., 2008. “Ethnicity, Conflict, and History in Burma: The Myths of Panglong”, Asian Survey, 48(6), pp.889-910; Holliday, I., 2010. “Ethnicity and Democratization in Myanmar”, Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), pp.111-128; Cheesman, N., 2017. “How in Myanmar ‘National Races’ Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya”, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 47(3), pp. 461-483.
參考閱讀: Than, T.M.M., 2005. “Dreams and Nightmares: State Building and Ethnic Conflict in Myanmar (Burma)”, Ethnic Conflicts in Southeast Asia, pp.65-108 |
|
第9週 |
11/11 |
威權韌性: 馬來西亞、新加坡、菲律賓
閱讀進度: Slater, Dan. 2010. “The Puzzles and Arguments”, In Ordering Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 3-32; Brownlee, J., 2008. Bound to rule: Party institutions and regime trajectories in Malaysia and the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 8(1), pp.89-118; George, C., 2007. Consolidating authoritarian rule: Calibrated coercion in Singapore. The Pacific Review, 20(2), pp.127-145.
|
|
第10週 |
11/18 |
威權韌性。泰國、柬埔寨、緬甸
閱讀進度: Chambers, P. and Waitoolkiat, N., 2016. The resilience of monarchised military in Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), pp.425-444; Morgenbesser, L., 2017. The failure of democratisation by elections in Cambodia. Contemporary Politics, 23(2), pp.135-155; Huang, R. L. 2013. “Re-thinking Myanmar’s political regime: military rule in Myanmar and implications for current reforms”, Contemporary Politics, 19(3), pp. 247-261. |
|
第11週 |
11/25 |
民主化挑戰: 印尼、菲律賓
閱讀進度: Morgenbesser, L. and Pepinsky, T.B., 2019. Elections as Causes of Democratization: Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 52(1), pp.3-35; Webber, D., 2006. A consolidated patrimonial democracy? Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Democratization, 13(3), pp.396-420; Bello, W. and Gershman, J., 1990. Democratization and Stabilization in the Philippines. Critical Sociology, 17(1), pp.35-56.
參考閱讀: Arugay, Aries and Aim Sinpeng. 2018. “Varieties of Authoritarianism and the Limits of Democracy in Southeast Asia”, In Alice D. Ba and Mark Beeson, eds., Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation. 3rd Edition. London: Palgrave. Pp. 91-109; Brown, David. 1996. “Ethnicity, Nationalism and Democracy,” in The State and Ethnic Politics in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, pp. 258-265; Aspinall, E., 2011. Democratization and ethnic politics in Indonesia: Nine theses. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(2), pp.289-319; Thompson, M.R., 1996. Off the endangered list: Philippine democratization in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, pp.179-205.
|
|
第12週 |
12/02 |
民主化挑戰: 馬來西亞、緬甸
閱讀進度：Ufen, A., 2020. “Opposition in Transition: Pre-electoral Coalitions and the 2018 Electoral Breakthrough in Malaysia”, Democratization, 27(2), pp.167-184; Ostwald, K. and Oliver, S., 2020. “Four Arenas: Malaysia’s 2018 Election, Reform, and Democratization”, Democratization, pp.1-19; Stokke, K. and Aung, S.M., 2019. “Transition to Democracy or Hybrid Regime? The Dynamics and Outcomes of Democratization in Myanmar”, The European Journal of Development Research, pp.1-20
參考閱讀: Christensen, D., Nguyen, M. and Sexton, R., 2019. “Strategic Violence during Democratization: Evidence from Myanmar”, World Politics, 71(2), pp.332-366. |
|
第13週 |
12/09 |
侍從主義與政黨政治: 印尼、菲律賓
閱讀進度: Hicken, A., 2011. Clientelism. Annual Review of political science, 14, pp.289-310; Teehankee, J., 2002. Electoral politics in the Philippines. Electoral Politics in Southeast and East Asia, pp.149-202; Sulistyo, H., 2002. Electoral politics in Indonesia: A hard way to democracy. Electoral Politics in Southeast Asia and East Asia, Singapore: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, pp.75-99.
延伸閱讀: Kitschelt, H., 2000. Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative political studies, 33(6-7), pp.845-879; Aspinall, E., 2014. When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), pp.545-570.
|
|
第14週 |
12/16 |
侍從主義與政黨政治: 馬來西亞、泰國、新加坡
閱讀進度: Kongkirati, P., 2014. The rise and fall of electoral violence in Thailand: changing rules, structures and power landscapes, 1997-2011. Contemporary Southeast Asia, pp.386-416; Weiss, M. L., 2019. Duelling networks: relational clientelism in electoral-authoritarian Malaysia, Democratization, published online July 1, 2019;Welsh, B., 2016. Clientelism and Control: PAP’s Fight for Safety in GE2015, The Round Table, 105(2), pp. 119-128.
延伸閱讀: Rahman, S., 2018. Was It a Malay Tsunami? Deconstructing the Malay Vote in Malaysia’s 2018 Election. The Round Table, 107(6), pp.669-682; |
|
第15週 |
12/23 |
民主倒退
閱讀進度: Bermeo, N. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding”, Journal of Democracy, 27(1), pp. 5-19; Warburton, E. and E. Aspinall. 2019. “Explaining Indonesia’s Democratic Regression”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), pp. 255-285; Thompson, M. R. 2020. "Pushback after backsliding? Unconstrained executive aggrandizement in the Philippines versus contested military-monarchical rule in Thailand", Democratization, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1835860
參考閱讀: Sawasdee, S. N. 2020. “Electoral Integrity and the Repercussions of Institutional Manipulations: The 2019 General Election in Thailand”, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(1), pp. 52-68; Teehankee, J. C. and Y. Kasuya. 2020. “The 2019 Midterm Elections in the Philippines: Party System Pathologies and Duterte’s Populist Mobilization”, Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 5(1), pp. 69-81.
|
|
第16週 |
12/30 |
綜合討論
閱讀進度: 無
|
|
第17週 |
1/06 |
綜合討論
閱讀進度: 無
|
|
第18週 |
1/13 |
繳交期末報告
於當天結束前上傳至作業區 |
|